Reza o Acordo Ortográfico: 6 Nas locuções de qualquer tipo, sejam elas substantivas, adjetivas, pronominais, adverbiais, prepositivas ou conjuncionais, não se emprega em geral o hífen, salvo algumas exceções já consagradas pelo uso (como é o caso de água-de-colónia, arco-da-velha, cor-de-rosa, mais-que-perfeito, pé-de-meia, ao deus-dará, à queima-roupa). Sirvam, pois, de exemplo de emprego sem hífen as seguintes locuções:
a) Substantivas: cão de guarda, fim de semana, sala de jantar;
O dicionário da Academia Brasileira de Letras segue o preceito e registra jardim de infância sem hifens, já o dicionário Priberam, mesmo quando se seleciona a opção Acordo Ortográfico tanto com a bandeira brasileira quanto com a portuguesa, continua apresentando jardim-de-infância com hifens. Será que o Priberam considera jardim de infância uma das exceções já consagradas pelo uso (eu não veria por quê) ou trata-se simplesmente dum descuido ou duma falha no sistema informático? Também acho perigosa a própria lista de exceções, que não tem caráter exaustivo. Quem decide se tal expressão é consagrada pelo uso ou não?
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Friday, August 26, 2011
Balinha
“Aceita uma balinha?”. Vocês estão rindo, mas eu não tinha nenhuma vontade de rir, porque balinha lá não quer dizer a mesma coisa que aqui. Quer dizer bala no sentido literal mesmo, projéctil de bala.
Não sei, mas acho que Mia Couto se embananou tanto. Bala no Brasil pode ser tanto projétil quanto confeito. Sei que há algumas regiões brasileiras onde não se diz bala, como em Pernambuco, se não estou enganado, onde se diz bombom, ainda que não seja de chocolate, o que, aliás, acontece também, por exemplo, em checo e alemão.
Não sei, mas acho que Mia Couto se embananou tanto. Bala no Brasil pode ser tanto projétil quanto confeito. Sei que há algumas regiões brasileiras onde não se diz bala, como em Pernambuco, se não estou enganado, onde se diz bombom, ainda que não seja de chocolate, o que, aliás, acontece também, por exemplo, em checo e alemão.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Flesh
Há uma lavanderia aqui chamada Flesh. Imagino que a intenção deles fosse escrever flash (raio) para dar ideia da rapidez com que ficam prontas as roupas que lhes são confiadas. A confusão deve ter originado do fato de flesh ter um e, que em português pode ser fechado ou aberto, mas neste caso pronunciado muita provavelmente aberto. Este som aberto, representado ɛ no Alfabeto Fonético Internacional, para ouvidos brasileiros é muito parecido à vogal que se ouve em flash em inglês, que é æ. Diria até que muitos brasileiros nem ouvem a diferença ou então não são capazes de reproduzi-la, incluindo a grande maioria dos professores brasileiros de inglês. O engraçado é que flesh em inglês não tem nada que ver com raio ou rapidez, mas significa carne, a carne viva dos seres animados, não a que se põe na mesa, já preparada.
Sunday, August 21, 2011
English: The Inescapable Language
This article is so full of fallacies that I felt the urge to write about it:
To hear a Spanish word is to know how to spell it and to see one is to know how to pronounce it. – Not 100% true. There are several issues regarding y/ll, s/z/c, v/b, j/g. Many people also have a hard time enforcing accent mark rules properly.
There are no spelling bees in Spanish-speaking schools because there are no bad spellers among native speakers of the language. – Anybody who has ever peered into a Spanish-language chatroom will disprove this.
In French there are three conjugations of verbs (the so-called -er, -ir, and -re verbs, after their infinitive endings). – French is said to have four main conjugation paradigms. There are also oir type verbs.
Portuguese has four (conjugations), Latin five, German two. – Portuguese has three conjugations. - Maybe the author was thinking of the only verb ending in or – pôr, to place, to put, but it falls into the second conjugation, since its thematic vowel is e and is derived from Latin ponere, also with an e. Latin has four conjugations: are, long ere, short ere and ire. How did he arrive at two German conjugations? Unless one counts infinitives ending in consonant plus n, almost always rn or ln, as a separate conjugation.
All the irregular forms of all the irregular verbs in English can be listed on less than a page of a paperback dictionary. It takes 16 pages to do that with Spanish irregular verbs. – Who counted the pages? How many irregular verbs were included? All? I doubt anybody knows precisely how many English and Spanish irregular verbs there are.
When a word is borrowed into English, we tend to maintain the spelling of the foreign word even as we adapt the pronunciation to the English sound structure. We borrowed two Greek words to coin photography and we still spell it in the Greek fashion. – I don’t get this. Greek spells it the Greek way, using the Greek alphabet: φοτογραφία. We could say, though, that Greek φ gets transliterated with ph, also probably because Greek φ was thought be pronounced as a p followed by an h sound or as an aspirated p millennia ago. Moreover, if we would like to split hairs, the Spanish spelling is fotografía. Fotografia is Portuguese, Italian, Catalan, or Romanian (with embedded definite article), among other languages.
The circumflex was then added to the preceding vowel to let the reader know the S used to be there, as if the reader cared. This is known as French logic. – Why should we have words like debt, phlegm and myriad others? English logic?
The average speaker of English has a vocabulary with about half again as many words as the average speaker of, say, French or German. – I don’t know what this is saying, but if it implies that an English speaker’s vocabulary is twice as large as a French or German speaker, I only say humbug to it.
That’s why the thesaurus and the dictionary of synonyms are standard reference works in English but seldom found in other languages. – The author should have dug deeper and he would have found them.
This multiplicity of words even extends to prefixes. To negate an adjective, for instance, one uses un- (as in uninterested), dis- (dishonest), in- (inattentive), or a- (amoral). – Other languages do the same. In Portuguese in, a, and des are also negative prefixes.
The advantage of the huge vocabulary of English, of course, is that it makes English a superb literary and scientific language, able to express fine and precise shades of meaning far more easily than other tongues. This is no small part of the reason English has become the near universal language of science. – Right. Camões, Machado de Assis, Eça de Queirós, Rilke, Schilling, Čapek, Goethe, Balzac, Molière, Zola, Danti, Cervantes, Manzoni, Tolstoi, Dostoievski, etc., all wrote in English. And no, English is the near universal language of science because English-speaking countries are the richest and the ones that foment science the most. If the richest country of the world were Afghanistan, everybody would be striving to write in Eastern Farsi or Southern Pashto, the two official languages of the country. The French extol the virtues of their own language as far as precision is concerned. Now who's right?
It also makes English more efficient. The English version of a lengthy text is always substantially shorter than versions in other languages. – The author has never seen Czech, Latin, Japanese and Chinese, just to name a few, renditions of an English text.
But while English has a very large everyday vocabulary, it also has the maddening habit of using the same word to mean many different things. Fly, for instance, means an annoying insect, a part of a pair of trousers, a part of a theater, a means of locomotion, the outer edge of a flag, a type of hit in baseball, and a type of hook for catching fish. A flyer can be either one who flies or a printed advertisement that is handed out. A bill is everything from the jaws of a bird to an invoice to a piece of legislation under consideration to an advertisement that is posted on a wall, not handed out. – This is called polysemy. All languages have it. I myself have written about the many meanings of Portuguese cravo.
English dominates the Internet. – If he calls dominate less than 50%, I will have to agree with him.
So we native speakers of English have a great advantage. Learning English at our mothers’ knee is almost like being born able to do algebra. – Huh?
To hear a Spanish word is to know how to spell it and to see one is to know how to pronounce it. – Not 100% true. There are several issues regarding y/ll, s/z/c, v/b, j/g. Many people also have a hard time enforcing accent mark rules properly.
There are no spelling bees in Spanish-speaking schools because there are no bad spellers among native speakers of the language. – Anybody who has ever peered into a Spanish-language chatroom will disprove this.
In French there are three conjugations of verbs (the so-called -er, -ir, and -re verbs, after their infinitive endings). – French is said to have four main conjugation paradigms. There are also oir type verbs.
Portuguese has four (conjugations), Latin five, German two. – Portuguese has three conjugations. - Maybe the author was thinking of the only verb ending in or – pôr, to place, to put, but it falls into the second conjugation, since its thematic vowel is e and is derived from Latin ponere, also with an e. Latin has four conjugations: are, long ere, short ere and ire. How did he arrive at two German conjugations? Unless one counts infinitives ending in consonant plus n, almost always rn or ln, as a separate conjugation.
All the irregular forms of all the irregular verbs in English can be listed on less than a page of a paperback dictionary. It takes 16 pages to do that with Spanish irregular verbs. – Who counted the pages? How many irregular verbs were included? All? I doubt anybody knows precisely how many English and Spanish irregular verbs there are.
When a word is borrowed into English, we tend to maintain the spelling of the foreign word even as we adapt the pronunciation to the English sound structure. We borrowed two Greek words to coin photography and we still spell it in the Greek fashion. – I don’t get this. Greek spells it the Greek way, using the Greek alphabet: φοτογραφία. We could say, though, that Greek φ gets transliterated with ph, also probably because Greek φ was thought be pronounced as a p followed by an h sound or as an aspirated p millennia ago. Moreover, if we would like to split hairs, the Spanish spelling is fotografía. Fotografia is Portuguese, Italian, Catalan, or Romanian (with embedded definite article), among other languages.
The circumflex was then added to the preceding vowel to let the reader know the S used to be there, as if the reader cared. This is known as French logic. – Why should we have words like debt, phlegm and myriad others? English logic?
The average speaker of English has a vocabulary with about half again as many words as the average speaker of, say, French or German. – I don’t know what this is saying, but if it implies that an English speaker’s vocabulary is twice as large as a French or German speaker, I only say humbug to it.
That’s why the thesaurus and the dictionary of synonyms are standard reference works in English but seldom found in other languages. – The author should have dug deeper and he would have found them.
This multiplicity of words even extends to prefixes. To negate an adjective, for instance, one uses un- (as in uninterested), dis- (dishonest), in- (inattentive), or a- (amoral). – Other languages do the same. In Portuguese in, a, and des are also negative prefixes.
The advantage of the huge vocabulary of English, of course, is that it makes English a superb literary and scientific language, able to express fine and precise shades of meaning far more easily than other tongues. This is no small part of the reason English has become the near universal language of science. – Right. Camões, Machado de Assis, Eça de Queirós, Rilke, Schilling, Čapek, Goethe, Balzac, Molière, Zola, Danti, Cervantes, Manzoni, Tolstoi, Dostoievski, etc., all wrote in English. And no, English is the near universal language of science because English-speaking countries are the richest and the ones that foment science the most. If the richest country of the world were Afghanistan, everybody would be striving to write in Eastern Farsi or Southern Pashto, the two official languages of the country. The French extol the virtues of their own language as far as precision is concerned. Now who's right?
It also makes English more efficient. The English version of a lengthy text is always substantially shorter than versions in other languages. – The author has never seen Czech, Latin, Japanese and Chinese, just to name a few, renditions of an English text.
But while English has a very large everyday vocabulary, it also has the maddening habit of using the same word to mean many different things. Fly, for instance, means an annoying insect, a part of a pair of trousers, a part of a theater, a means of locomotion, the outer edge of a flag, a type of hit in baseball, and a type of hook for catching fish. A flyer can be either one who flies or a printed advertisement that is handed out. A bill is everything from the jaws of a bird to an invoice to a piece of legislation under consideration to an advertisement that is posted on a wall, not handed out. – This is called polysemy. All languages have it. I myself have written about the many meanings of Portuguese cravo.
English dominates the Internet. – If he calls dominate less than 50%, I will have to agree with him.
So we native speakers of English have a great advantage. Learning English at our mothers’ knee is almost like being born able to do algebra. – Huh?
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Ao qual Flavia foi condenada a viver.
Com minha luta tento compensar, se é que isso é possível, a dolorosa convivência com o silêncio ao qual Flavia foi condenada a viver.
O que há de estranho? Essa oração adjetiva iniciada por ao qual estaria certa se a oração principal terminasse com condenada, pois se é condenado a algo: a dolorosa convivência com o silêncio ao qual Flavia foi condenada. Como Flavia foi condenada a viver com o silêncio, então teríamos a dolorosa convivência com o silêncio com o qual Flavia foi condenada a viver.
O que há de estranho? Essa oração adjetiva iniciada por ao qual estaria certa se a oração principal terminasse com condenada, pois se é condenado a algo: a dolorosa convivência com o silêncio ao qual Flavia foi condenada. Como Flavia foi condenada a viver com o silêncio, então teríamos a dolorosa convivência com o silêncio com o qual Flavia foi condenada a viver.
Friday, August 12, 2011
O nome já diz tudo
Big Tasty - O nome já diz tudo. Não, o nome não diz nada para 90% dos brasileiros, que não sabem que tasty significa gostoso em inglês.
Saturday, August 6, 2011
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Sorvete de blueberry
É, parece que mirtilo está perdendo para blueberry mesmo, como já se indicou aqui. Está certo que a fruta não era conhecida até um tempo por aqui, refiro-me especificamente ao interior do Estado de São Paulo, é possível que o mesmo valha para o resto do Brasil, mas não poderiam dar-lhe o nome vernáculo? Uns dias atrás fui tomar um sorvete no McDonald's e vi que anunciavam sorvete de blueberry. Fiquei até com vontade de pedir um sorvete de mirtilo, mas estava com um pouco de pressa e teria de explicar à moça o que é o tal do mirtilo e ela com certeza me olharia com ar de superioridade, como se eu um fosse um jacuzão e sem pejo algum exclamaria: Ah, o de blueberry!
Monday, August 1, 2011
Limpeza de sofa
Há uma lavanderia aqui que faz limpeza de sofá a seco onde antes se via Limpeza de sofá em um anúncio e a dez metros em outro anúncio Limpeza de sofa. Agora passei por lá e vi que alguém foi com uma tinta e tirou o acento do sofá. Pelo menos ficou tudo igual. :)
Saturday, July 30, 2011
Concerns over Decontamination
An Unsworn Testimony on Health Influences of Radiation, given by witness Tatsuhiko Kodama (professor of Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, head of Radioisotope Center, of Tokyo University)
given at Welfare and Labour Committee of the House of Commons that met on 2011-07-27 Wednesday (starting at 09:00)
[Chairman: Next, Mr. Kodama. Please begin.]
I am Kodama, the head of Radioisotope Center in Tokyo University. I was very surprised on March 15th.
Tokyo University has 27 radioisotope centers that are committed to radiation protection and decontamination. I myself am a doctor of internal medicine. I have been doing decontamination works at radiation facilities for the last few dacades.
On March 15th, as this panel shows, we first detected a 5 μ Sievert dose around 9 AM in Tokai-mura Village, which we immediately reported to MEXT in compliance with the Article 10 (of Act on Special Measures Concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness). Later, they detected a dosage over 0.5 μSv in Tokyo. Then there was a transient decrease. Next, there was a rainfall in Tokyo on March 22rd. Fallouts scored 0.2 μSv and so on. This was the cause of the high radiation that remains till today.
At that time, Mr. Edano, the chief cabinet secretary, made a public announcement to the effect that it was not an immediate health problem, but I knew this was going to be disastrous.
I'll state the reason. The current "Laws Concerning the Prevention from Radiation Hazards due to Radioisotopes and Others" pertain to disposing small amounts of radioactive matter with high dosage. The problem it deals with is not the gross amount but the density of individual doses. The current Fukushima I accident is very different. It discharged radioactivity as strong as 5 μSv in the 100-kilometre radius, 0.5 μSv in the 200-kilometre radius. Further than these areas, it has contaminated tea-leaves grown in Ashigara and Shizuoka. I expect everyone knows about these today.
Experts of radiation damage, myself included, are interested in the gross amount.Then if TEPCO and the Government have made a detailed report on the gross amount of radioactive material discharged in this Fukushima I incident? No.
Our Radioisotope Center have made calculations based on expertise. In terms of heat quantity, the discharge is as 29.6 times as large as that of Hiroshima Atom Bomb. In terms of uranium equivalence, the discharge is as large as 20 Hiroshima Bombs.
Even horrifying still is the slowness of decrease. Today we know that radioactive discharge from power plants only gets to one tenth within a year while that from an atom bomb decreases to the one thousandth.
Everything should be based on the fact that this accident, like Chernobyl, has discharged radiation equalling to tens of bombs and the residual radiation is much worse than contamination by bombs.
From the viewpoint of systematic biology, an application of system theories, in case of small discharges, the density of individual contaminations matters most. In case of huge discharges, the key is particles. The proliferation of particles is dealt in a non-linear way, one of the most difficult calculations in fluid dynamics. Quite simply, nuclear fuels are like sand grains embedded in synthetic resin. When the reactor melts down and there is a discharge, a lot of fine grains are emitted.
When they are emitted, they cause problems such as the current issue with rice straws. [Caesium-contaminated rice straws from Miyagi was fed to meat cows. Not all beef samples exceeded the legal 500 bq/Kg but some of the meat has been consumed. Contaminated straws were from very far places distant-wise. The contaminant was a rain cloud in March that travelled in the wind as southwards as Kanto and then to the north. This is the same cloud that made Iidate an extra evacuation zone.]
Contaminations found in rice straws are for instance, 57000 bq/Kg in Fujisawa-chō Town, Iwate, 17000 bq/Kg in Ōsaki, Miyagi, 106000 bq/Kg in Minami-Sōma, 97000 bq/Kg in Shirakawa-shi, 64000 bq/Kg in Iwate-shi. As theses figures tell, dosage levels cannot be mapped on concentric circles. Strength of dosage depends on the weather as well as if the material has absorbed water.
Every week I travel for 700 kilometres to Minami-Sōma with the Radioisotope Center team from Tokyo University. We have done decontamination works for seven times up to present. When we first got there, there was only one dosimeter available. Ministry of Agriculture say that they have passed on the notice not to feed rice straws to cattle on March 19th. On the same day, the mayor of Minami-Sōma made a well-known announcement on the Web, including a heart-felt request for food, water and petrol.
While a crisis like this was unfolding, no one can be expected to read or know about the notice written on a piece of paper. No farmers knew that their rice straws are so dangerous. They, however, started buying feedstuff for extra few hundreds of thousand yen. On that day on, they have been giving the same groundwater that they themselves drink.
The first thing we should do is to make a thorough measurement possible in contaminated areas. Like I said, Minami-Sōma had only one dosimeter when we first went there. But in fact they already had got 20 personal meters from the US military. They at the education committee in the city hall, however, couldn't read the English instruction manual. These 20 meters had not been used until we read them the document and showed how to use dosimeters. A glimpse of how things were there.
Food inspection has hitherto been discussed in this committee. Why use germanium counters? Nowadays, a lot of imaging-based measuring devices have been developed on semiconductors.
Why do the Government not make extensive application of them and invest money across the nation?
There has not been no such attempts after three months, which I resent from the bottom of my heart.
My second point is internal exposure.
Prime Minister Obuchi has appointed me as the head of antigen medicine development at Cabinet Office. This research field now gets 3 billion yen from Funding Program for the World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology. Radioactive isotopes are used to mark antigen drugs so we can check how they treat cancer. Otherwise said, my job is injecting isotope into human body. This is how internal exposure is the top-most priority in my researches.
So, let me explain how internal exposure happens.
The biggest issue with internal exposure is cancer. Cancers are born from dissected DNAs. DNAs are usually put together in double helix, which is very stable. When a cell divides, the double helix separates into single helices, then doubles into 4 helices. The danger is in this process.
Radiation damage poses a tremendous danger for the foetus in a expecting mother, small children as well as for cells with active division in growing phase. Even in adults, actively dividing cells are dangerous; causing loss of hair, anaemia. Cells in intestinal epithelia are affected too. These are a few basics about radiation damage.
I shall cite reported examples of internal exposure.
Mutation on a single gene does not cause cancer.
After the first radiation hit, there is another factor, and then there is a cancerous mutation. These are called driver mutation or passenger mutation by experts. For them, please refer to the literature listed in the last pages. We will now look at examples of Chernobyl and caesium.
The most famous cause is alpha particles. I was alerted by a Tokyo Univ. professor that he thinks it is okay to drink plutonium solution.
Alpha particles are one of the most dangerous matters.
Liver specialists like myself know this from liver damage by thorotrast.
This committee has been discussing internal exposure in a generic so and so mili Sievert but that's senseless.
I-131 concentrates in the thyroid gland. Thorotrast concentrates in the liver. Caesium concentrates on the urinary tract epithelium and the bladder. Unless you look at these places of concentration, no whole-body scan is meaningless.
Details of Thorotrast can be found in the reference materials. Thorotrast is a contrast agent, first used in Germany in 1890 and in Japan around 1930. After 20 to 30 years of use, it was found to cause liver cancer by 25 to 30%.
Cancers take 20 years to develop in this way. First, thorotrast, being an alpha radiation nuclide, damages adjacent cells with alpha particles. The likeliest victim is a gene called P53. According to genome science today, knowledge of exhaustive patterns of human genes, one human is different from another in about three million genes.
Nowadays, it is totally meaningless to treat a patient on the assumption that all humans are the same.
Applying the so-called personal life medicine, internal exposure to radiation should be diagnosed basically by looking at which genes have been damaged with what effects.
Thorotrast, in the first step, destroyed P53 gene. Second and third mutations take 20 to 30 years. This is the proven steps for liver cancer and leukaemia.
Next, iodine 131.
As you know, iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland. Concentration in the thyroid gland is most typical to the thyroid growth period, that is, for small children.
Despite this, when researchers in Ukraine first reported a frequent occurrence of thyroid cancer in 1991, some researchers in Japan and USA criticised the report on Nature. Their ground for reasoning was that the report was not statistically significant due to the absence of data prior to 1986.
Like Professor Nagataki mentioned just now, statistical significance was proven 20 years later. After 20 years, disappearance of the peak started in 1986 was taken as the evidence despite the absence of previous data. Proving something epidemically is very difficult; it usually takes until all cases are over.
Saving children, which is the perspective now incumbent upon us, requires a very different approach. An example of this approach is by Doctor Shōji Fukushima at the national Japan Bioassay Research Center. This is a research institute for analysing effects of chemical compounds. He has been studying samples found in urinary system from Chernobyl. Fukushima and Ukraininan doctors collected over 500 bladders taken out while operating on enlarged prostates. They have found that high-level contamination zones, where radiation can be found in urines however small around 6 bq/L, have steep rise of mutations in P53. This is accompanied by proliferative precarcinomatous state, inferred from activation of P38, an MAP kinase and a signal called NF-κB. This necessarily leads of proliferative bladder infection. High probability of intraepithelial cancer is also reported.
With this, I have been appalled to hear the report of radiation between 2 and 13 Becquerels found in milk from seven Fukushima mothers.
Please turn to the next page.
We at Radioisotope Center sends four personnels every week, travelling 700 kilometres to help Minami-Sōma city decontaminate. For problems in Minami-Sōma as elsewhere, telling 20-kilometre radius from 30-kilometre radius does not make sense at all. Unless we measure different parts of each kindergarten, everything is meaningless. Presently, they hire buses to send 1700 Minami-Sōma children from the 20km-zone to the 30km-zone. In fact, Minami-Sōma's radiation concentrates on the cost line. Dosage is relatively low at about 70% of schools.
Despite this, they send school buses into the 30km-zone, and this is closer to Iidate. They spend one million yen per day to forcibly send children there. This must be stopped as soon as possible.
The single biggest obstacle for children's safety is the policy of not compensating losses for evacuation other than by forced evacuation; such was the statement by TEPCO'S then-president Mr. Shimizu and Mr. Kaieda, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry at the previous committee in the Upper House. Still, they must be discussed separately.
Please set problems of compensation, or where to limit compensation, apart from the issue with children.
I beg you to apply all of your strength to protect children.
Another request.
Please devise plans for permanent decontamination, not just impromptu one.
We do impromptu decontamination on a frequent basis. This diagram lists "under the slide." Little children touch the place under the slide. Despite this, every time rain water flows down on the slide, it gets condensed dosage. If the two sides of the slide are uneven, one slide gets them all. In a place where the average dosage is 1 μ, 10 μ or above can be detected under the slide. Places like this can use immediate, impromptu decontamination a lot.
Children also touch places under the drip moulding, where various moss species grow. Using pressure washer to blow mosss growths off, the dosage drops from 2 μ to 0.5 μ.
Still, getting radiation below the 0.5 μ level is very difficult.
If the whole building or the whole tree growth or the whole community is contaminated, washing radiation down in one place does not really contribute to lowering the air dose rate of a area. I draw on the case of itai-itai disease (softening of bones and kidney failure in Toyama Prefecture identified as cadmium poisoning in the 1950s) for tasks and costs of serious decontamination works. Cadmium-contaminated area is about 3000 hectares, out of which 1500 hectares have been decontaminated so far for 800 billion yen, at government expense. If the current contamination is spread to 1000 times as large areas, I cannot even begin to contemplate how much the Government should spend.
Having said all this, I should like to make four urgent proposals.
First, radiological exams needs a fundamental improvement with Japan's most advanced imaging devices. Imaging is now very easy with semiconductor instruments. With advanced imaging machines, exams will be a quick automatic process. Please commit to this as a national policy. This is well within the scientific, technological means of Japan today.
Second, immediately pass a new law to reduce exposure of children.
Everything that I do now is against the law.
The current Prevention from Radiation Hazards Law decrees facilities need authorisation for dosage levels and types of nuclides. I am mobilising all 27 isotope centers at TU to help Minami-Sōma, but many facilities haven't got authorisation to handle caesium. It's against the law to use cars to transport radioactive materials. Still, I cannot give high-dose decontamination waste to those mothers and teachers and let them dispose of it, so we pack it in drums and bring them back to TU.
Accepting them into our facilities is against the law.
Everything is against the law.
The Parliament is responsible for this negligence. Many facilities all over Japan, such as radioisotope centers in national universities, are equipped with the most advance devices such as germanium detectors. Why are they tied hand and foot while we have to mobilize the full potential of the people to protect children?
The Parliament has been completely negligent in its duties.
Third, please make it a national policy to bring together the expertise in the private sector for soil decontamination. They have a lot of know-how for radiation removal; chemical manufacturers such as TORAY and Kurita, manufacturers of radiation removal devices such as Chiyoda Technol and ATOX, as well as Takenaka the construction company. Please make use of their power to make a research center for decontamination in Fukushima.
This is going to cost tens of trillion yen from the national treasure. I am worried that, if this goes on, the work is reduced to just another public work projects, marred with right hunting.
Considering the tough fiscal situation, you cannot afford that even for one moment. You should be thinking how to do the real work of decontamination. What have you been doing in the Parliament while 70 thousand people are driving out of their homes?
[I haven't gotten around to translate what Prof. Kodama said in the following Q&A session.]
Kodama was invited to speak before the committee by MP Tomoko Abe (Social Democratic Party).
given at Welfare and Labour Committee of the House of Commons that met on 2011-07-27 Wednesday (starting at 09:00)
[Chairman: Next, Mr. Kodama. Please begin.]
I am Kodama, the head of Radioisotope Center in Tokyo University. I was very surprised on March 15th.
Tokyo University has 27 radioisotope centers that are committed to radiation protection and decontamination. I myself am a doctor of internal medicine. I have been doing decontamination works at radiation facilities for the last few dacades.
On March 15th, as this panel shows, we first detected a 5 μ Sievert dose around 9 AM in Tokai-mura Village, which we immediately reported to MEXT in compliance with the Article 10 (of Act on Special Measures Concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness). Later, they detected a dosage over 0.5 μSv in Tokyo. Then there was a transient decrease. Next, there was a rainfall in Tokyo on March 22rd. Fallouts scored 0.2 μSv and so on. This was the cause of the high radiation that remains till today.
At that time, Mr. Edano, the chief cabinet secretary, made a public announcement to the effect that it was not an immediate health problem, but I knew this was going to be disastrous.
I'll state the reason. The current "Laws Concerning the Prevention from Radiation Hazards due to Radioisotopes and Others" pertain to disposing small amounts of radioactive matter with high dosage. The problem it deals with is not the gross amount but the density of individual doses. The current Fukushima I accident is very different. It discharged radioactivity as strong as 5 μSv in the 100-kilometre radius, 0.5 μSv in the 200-kilometre radius. Further than these areas, it has contaminated tea-leaves grown in Ashigara and Shizuoka. I expect everyone knows about these today.
Experts of radiation damage, myself included, are interested in the gross amount.Then if TEPCO and the Government have made a detailed report on the gross amount of radioactive material discharged in this Fukushima I incident? No.
Our Radioisotope Center have made calculations based on expertise. In terms of heat quantity, the discharge is as 29.6 times as large as that of Hiroshima Atom Bomb. In terms of uranium equivalence, the discharge is as large as 20 Hiroshima Bombs.
Even horrifying still is the slowness of decrease. Today we know that radioactive discharge from power plants only gets to one tenth within a year while that from an atom bomb decreases to the one thousandth.
Everything should be based on the fact that this accident, like Chernobyl, has discharged radiation equalling to tens of bombs and the residual radiation is much worse than contamination by bombs.
From the viewpoint of systematic biology, an application of system theories, in case of small discharges, the density of individual contaminations matters most. In case of huge discharges, the key is particles. The proliferation of particles is dealt in a non-linear way, one of the most difficult calculations in fluid dynamics. Quite simply, nuclear fuels are like sand grains embedded in synthetic resin. When the reactor melts down and there is a discharge, a lot of fine grains are emitted.
When they are emitted, they cause problems such as the current issue with rice straws. [Caesium-contaminated rice straws from Miyagi was fed to meat cows. Not all beef samples exceeded the legal 500 bq/Kg but some of the meat has been consumed. Contaminated straws were from very far places distant-wise. The contaminant was a rain cloud in March that travelled in the wind as southwards as Kanto and then to the north. This is the same cloud that made Iidate an extra evacuation zone.]
Contaminations found in rice straws are for instance, 57000 bq/Kg in Fujisawa-chō Town, Iwate, 17000 bq/Kg in Ōsaki, Miyagi, 106000 bq/Kg in Minami-Sōma, 97000 bq/Kg in Shirakawa-shi, 64000 bq/Kg in Iwate-shi. As theses figures tell, dosage levels cannot be mapped on concentric circles. Strength of dosage depends on the weather as well as if the material has absorbed water.
Every week I travel for 700 kilometres to Minami-Sōma with the Radioisotope Center team from Tokyo University. We have done decontamination works for seven times up to present. When we first got there, there was only one dosimeter available. Ministry of Agriculture say that they have passed on the notice not to feed rice straws to cattle on March 19th. On the same day, the mayor of Minami-Sōma made a well-known announcement on the Web, including a heart-felt request for food, water and petrol.
While a crisis like this was unfolding, no one can be expected to read or know about the notice written on a piece of paper. No farmers knew that their rice straws are so dangerous. They, however, started buying feedstuff for extra few hundreds of thousand yen. On that day on, they have been giving the same groundwater that they themselves drink.
The first thing we should do is to make a thorough measurement possible in contaminated areas. Like I said, Minami-Sōma had only one dosimeter when we first went there. But in fact they already had got 20 personal meters from the US military. They at the education committee in the city hall, however, couldn't read the English instruction manual. These 20 meters had not been used until we read them the document and showed how to use dosimeters. A glimpse of how things were there.
Food inspection has hitherto been discussed in this committee. Why use germanium counters? Nowadays, a lot of imaging-based measuring devices have been developed on semiconductors.
Why do the Government not make extensive application of them and invest money across the nation?
There has not been no such attempts after three months, which I resent from the bottom of my heart.
My second point is internal exposure.
Prime Minister Obuchi has appointed me as the head of antigen medicine development at Cabinet Office. This research field now gets 3 billion yen from Funding Program for the World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology. Radioactive isotopes are used to mark antigen drugs so we can check how they treat cancer. Otherwise said, my job is injecting isotope into human body. This is how internal exposure is the top-most priority in my researches.
So, let me explain how internal exposure happens.
The biggest issue with internal exposure is cancer. Cancers are born from dissected DNAs. DNAs are usually put together in double helix, which is very stable. When a cell divides, the double helix separates into single helices, then doubles into 4 helices. The danger is in this process.
Radiation damage poses a tremendous danger for the foetus in a expecting mother, small children as well as for cells with active division in growing phase. Even in adults, actively dividing cells are dangerous; causing loss of hair, anaemia. Cells in intestinal epithelia are affected too. These are a few basics about radiation damage.
I shall cite reported examples of internal exposure.
Mutation on a single gene does not cause cancer.
After the first radiation hit, there is another factor, and then there is a cancerous mutation. These are called driver mutation or passenger mutation by experts. For them, please refer to the literature listed in the last pages. We will now look at examples of Chernobyl and caesium.
The most famous cause is alpha particles. I was alerted by a Tokyo Univ. professor that he thinks it is okay to drink plutonium solution.
Alpha particles are one of the most dangerous matters.
Liver specialists like myself know this from liver damage by thorotrast.
This committee has been discussing internal exposure in a generic so and so mili Sievert but that's senseless.
I-131 concentrates in the thyroid gland. Thorotrast concentrates in the liver. Caesium concentrates on the urinary tract epithelium and the bladder. Unless you look at these places of concentration, no whole-body scan is meaningless.
Details of Thorotrast can be found in the reference materials. Thorotrast is a contrast agent, first used in Germany in 1890 and in Japan around 1930. After 20 to 30 years of use, it was found to cause liver cancer by 25 to 30%.
Cancers take 20 years to develop in this way. First, thorotrast, being an alpha radiation nuclide, damages adjacent cells with alpha particles. The likeliest victim is a gene called P53. According to genome science today, knowledge of exhaustive patterns of human genes, one human is different from another in about three million genes.
Nowadays, it is totally meaningless to treat a patient on the assumption that all humans are the same.
Applying the so-called personal life medicine, internal exposure to radiation should be diagnosed basically by looking at which genes have been damaged with what effects.
Thorotrast, in the first step, destroyed P53 gene. Second and third mutations take 20 to 30 years. This is the proven steps for liver cancer and leukaemia.
Next, iodine 131.
As you know, iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland. Concentration in the thyroid gland is most typical to the thyroid growth period, that is, for small children.
Despite this, when researchers in Ukraine first reported a frequent occurrence of thyroid cancer in 1991, some researchers in Japan and USA criticised the report on Nature. Their ground for reasoning was that the report was not statistically significant due to the absence of data prior to 1986.
Like Professor Nagataki mentioned just now, statistical significance was proven 20 years later. After 20 years, disappearance of the peak started in 1986 was taken as the evidence despite the absence of previous data. Proving something epidemically is very difficult; it usually takes until all cases are over.
Saving children, which is the perspective now incumbent upon us, requires a very different approach. An example of this approach is by Doctor Shōji Fukushima at the national Japan Bioassay Research Center. This is a research institute for analysing effects of chemical compounds. He has been studying samples found in urinary system from Chernobyl. Fukushima and Ukraininan doctors collected over 500 bladders taken out while operating on enlarged prostates. They have found that high-level contamination zones, where radiation can be found in urines however small around 6 bq/L, have steep rise of mutations in P53. This is accompanied by proliferative precarcinomatous state, inferred from activation of P38, an MAP kinase and a signal called NF-κB. This necessarily leads of proliferative bladder infection. High probability of intraepithelial cancer is also reported.
With this, I have been appalled to hear the report of radiation between 2 and 13 Becquerels found in milk from seven Fukushima mothers.
Please turn to the next page.
We at Radioisotope Center sends four personnels every week, travelling 700 kilometres to help Minami-Sōma city decontaminate. For problems in Minami-Sōma as elsewhere, telling 20-kilometre radius from 30-kilometre radius does not make sense at all. Unless we measure different parts of each kindergarten, everything is meaningless. Presently, they hire buses to send 1700 Minami-Sōma children from the 20km-zone to the 30km-zone. In fact, Minami-Sōma's radiation concentrates on the cost line. Dosage is relatively low at about 70% of schools.
Despite this, they send school buses into the 30km-zone, and this is closer to Iidate. They spend one million yen per day to forcibly send children there. This must be stopped as soon as possible.
The single biggest obstacle for children's safety is the policy of not compensating losses for evacuation other than by forced evacuation; such was the statement by TEPCO'S then-president Mr. Shimizu and Mr. Kaieda, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry at the previous committee in the Upper House. Still, they must be discussed separately.
Please set problems of compensation, or where to limit compensation, apart from the issue with children.
I beg you to apply all of your strength to protect children.
Another request.
Please devise plans for permanent decontamination, not just impromptu one.
We do impromptu decontamination on a frequent basis. This diagram lists "under the slide." Little children touch the place under the slide. Despite this, every time rain water flows down on the slide, it gets condensed dosage. If the two sides of the slide are uneven, one slide gets them all. In a place where the average dosage is 1 μ, 10 μ or above can be detected under the slide. Places like this can use immediate, impromptu decontamination a lot.
Children also touch places under the drip moulding, where various moss species grow. Using pressure washer to blow mosss growths off, the dosage drops from 2 μ to 0.5 μ.
Still, getting radiation below the 0.5 μ level is very difficult.
If the whole building or the whole tree growth or the whole community is contaminated, washing radiation down in one place does not really contribute to lowering the air dose rate of a area. I draw on the case of itai-itai disease (softening of bones and kidney failure in Toyama Prefecture identified as cadmium poisoning in the 1950s) for tasks and costs of serious decontamination works. Cadmium-contaminated area is about 3000 hectares, out of which 1500 hectares have been decontaminated so far for 800 billion yen, at government expense. If the current contamination is spread to 1000 times as large areas, I cannot even begin to contemplate how much the Government should spend.
Having said all this, I should like to make four urgent proposals.
First, radiological exams needs a fundamental improvement with Japan's most advanced imaging devices. Imaging is now very easy with semiconductor instruments. With advanced imaging machines, exams will be a quick automatic process. Please commit to this as a national policy. This is well within the scientific, technological means of Japan today.
Second, immediately pass a new law to reduce exposure of children.
Everything that I do now is against the law.
The current Prevention from Radiation Hazards Law decrees facilities need authorisation for dosage levels and types of nuclides. I am mobilising all 27 isotope centers at TU to help Minami-Sōma, but many facilities haven't got authorisation to handle caesium. It's against the law to use cars to transport radioactive materials. Still, I cannot give high-dose decontamination waste to those mothers and teachers and let them dispose of it, so we pack it in drums and bring them back to TU.
Accepting them into our facilities is against the law.
Everything is against the law.
The Parliament is responsible for this negligence. Many facilities all over Japan, such as radioisotope centers in national universities, are equipped with the most advance devices such as germanium detectors. Why are they tied hand and foot while we have to mobilize the full potential of the people to protect children?
The Parliament has been completely negligent in its duties.
Third, please make it a national policy to bring together the expertise in the private sector for soil decontamination. They have a lot of know-how for radiation removal; chemical manufacturers such as TORAY and Kurita, manufacturers of radiation removal devices such as Chiyoda Technol and ATOX, as well as Takenaka the construction company. Please make use of their power to make a research center for decontamination in Fukushima.
This is going to cost tens of trillion yen from the national treasure. I am worried that, if this goes on, the work is reduced to just another public work projects, marred with right hunting.
Considering the tough fiscal situation, you cannot afford that even for one moment. You should be thinking how to do the real work of decontamination. What have you been doing in the Parliament while 70 thousand people are driving out of their homes?
[I haven't gotten around to translate what Prof. Kodama said in the following Q&A session.]
Kodama was invited to speak before the committee by MP Tomoko Abe (Social Democratic Party).
Friday, July 29, 2011
Apenasmente
Ouvi pela primeira vez na vida a palavra apenasmente nesta entrevista do Programa do Jô. Apenasmente é um pouco estranho e redundante, já que apenas já é advérbio. Ter-se-á formado por analogia com outros advérbios em mente, principalmente somente, que se pode considerar sinônimo. Mas não é só isso que me surpreende, mas também uma declaração do Ciberdúvidas de que apenasmente não se diz em Portugal. Como é possível sabê-lo? O consultor já falou com mais de dez milhões de pessoas para saber se isto ou aquilo se diz ou não? Eu não ousaria fazer uma declaração assim nem com relação à minha cidade, que tem umas 130 000 pessoas. Mas pelo menos o que se lê no Ciberdúvidas apresenta um ano, 1998, o que significa que o palabro, como dizem os espanhóis, não é tão novo assim. O engraçado é que apenasmente me parece coisa de quem quer falar bonito, mas infelizmente não consegue.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Para inauguração
Faixa na frente dum templo da Assembleia de Deus: Convidamos a todos para inauguração desta casa de oração. Fiquei pensando no porquê da omissão do artigo depois da preposição para. É possível que para, por já terminar em a, tenha sido interpretado como algo que já tem o artigo feminino embutido, já que na fala, quando uma palavra termina com a e a outra começa com a, é comum pronunciar apenas um a. Ou trata-se simplesmente do uso da preposição sem artigo? Pondo uma palavra masculina no lugar, teríamos Convidamos a todos para encerramento desta casa de oração. Não sei, para mim falta o artigo aí por se tratar de termo determinado por desta casa de oração. Ou então parece manchete de jornal ou linguagem telegráfica, pelo menos para mim.
É uma pena que a igreja, reformada recentemente, mantenha a grafia Assembléia de Deus - em vez de Assembleia de Deus - que deixará de ser correta findo o período de transição para a implantação do Acordo Ortográfico em 1 de janeiro de 2013.
É uma pena que a igreja, reformada recentemente, mantenha a grafia Assembléia de Deus - em vez de Assembleia de Deus - que deixará de ser correta findo o período de transição para a implantação do Acordo Ortográfico em 1 de janeiro de 2013.
Monday, July 25, 2011
Desentupidor de pia
É interessante ver como diferentes línguas nomeiam o mesmo instrumento com base em pontos de vista distintos. Algumas se baseiam na forma, como é o caso de zvon (sino) em checo. Outras se prendem à função que desempenha, como em português, em italiano (sturalavandino, de sturare, desentupir, mais lavandino, pia, derivado de lavare, lavar) e em espanhol (desatascador, destupidor, mas há vários nomes) e outras incluem na mesma palavra a função e a forma, como Saugglocke em alemão, de saugen, chupar, mais Glocke, sino, cognato de clock em inglês, relógio. O plunger inglês é meio vago, já que plunge, o verbo, significa mergulhar, afundar, portanto plunger é algo que mergulha, afunda.
Saturday, July 23, 2011
Rosticeria
Acabei de ver rosticeria, mas também já vi por aqui rosticceria e rôtisserie. Como ficamos? Em italiano é rosticceria (dois cc) e em francês, rôtisserie. Rosticeria é por não conhecer a forma correta em italiano ou por querer aportuguesar a palavra. Acontece que a palavra já aparece aportuguesada em 1935, segundo o dicionário Houaiss, sob a forma rotisseria. Seria interessante saber como as pessoas que trabalham nas rosticerias ou rosticcerias daqui pronunciam esse c, como tch ou como ss.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Puro-sangue
É interessante como as diferentes línguas neolatinas tratam o plural da palavra puro-sangue, pelo menos normativamente. Em português, tem tanto o adjetivo quanto o substantivo pluralizados: o puro-sangue, os puros-sangues. Em espanhol, apenas o segundo elemento é variável: el purasangre, los purasangres, notando que a concordância é siléptica, com o substantivo caballo, já que sangre em espanhol é feminino (la sangre). Em italiano e em francês, o composto é invariável: il/i purosangue, le/les pur-sang. Em romeno, pelo que pude apurar na Internet, usa-se muito mais como adjetivo, também invariável, qualificando cal (cavalo): pursânge.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Superbem
Existe por aqui um programa regional chamado Superbem. Teoricamente deveria grafar-se Superbém, por o prefixo super se aglutinar à palavra seguinte, a menos que esta comece com h, e por o todo constituir uma palavra oxítona terminada em ém, a par de também, porém, amém, etc. No entanto, pergunto-me se aí ainda se trata do prefixo super. Tenho minhas dúvidas. Parece que super já adquiriu vida própria como advérbio de intensidade, com significado semelhante ao de muito, extremamente, demasiado, etc., e, por ser paroxítono, passaria a escrever-se súper, daí que o programa passaria a ser grafado Súper Bem.
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Ranzinzas
Outra do livro mencionado abaixo:
No entanto, qualquer levantamento mostra o contrário: construções do tipo de os relógio são amplamente utilizados pela totalidade da população, incluindo os "cultos" (está bem, vamos excetuar alguns ranzinzas amigos do lhe e do lho). Duvidam? Pois gravem uma conversa entre interlocutores de nível universitário, e depois vejam se pelo menos 50% dos sintagmas no plural não são marcados apenas no primeiro elemento. (Grifo meu.)
Será que em 1997, quando foi escrito este livro, já não se alastrara o lheísmo de que já escrevi algumas vezes neste mesmo espaço? Será que todos os lheístas são ranzinzas? Concordo que lho não se ouve (por enquanto, mas pode voltar), mas o lhe?
No entanto, qualquer levantamento mostra o contrário: construções do tipo de os relógio são amplamente utilizados pela totalidade da população, incluindo os "cultos" (está bem, vamos excetuar alguns ranzinzas amigos do lhe e do lho). Duvidam? Pois gravem uma conversa entre interlocutores de nível universitário, e depois vejam se pelo menos 50% dos sintagmas no plural não são marcados apenas no primeiro elemento. (Grifo meu.)
Será que em 1997, quando foi escrito este livro, já não se alastrara o lheísmo de que já escrevi algumas vezes neste mesmo espaço? Será que todos os lheístas são ranzinzas? Concordo que lho não se ouve (por enquanto, mas pode voltar), mas o lhe?
Friday, July 15, 2011
Tumate
Do livro Sofrendo a Gramática, de Mário A. Perini:
Vamos começar com um caso bem simples, que tem a ver com a relação entre a ortografia e a pronúncia: a primeira vogal da palavra tomate, na pronúncia, é u. Isso não é característica da "pronúncia inculta", mas da fala de todas as pessoas, de qualquer classe social ou nível de escolarização. Se você não acredita, vá ao mercado ou ao sacolão e fique de tocaia junto a uma banca de legumes: quantas pessoas perguntam o preço do "tumate" e quanto as do "tomate"? Você rapidamente se convencerá de que a pronúncia normal é com u. No entanto, muita gente nega isso. Alguns professores de português (que deveriam estar bem informados a respeito) insistem comigo que a pronúncia é com "o". (Grifo meu.)
Sei o que ele quis dizer, e tem razão, mas o exemplo que colheu foi muito infeliz. Isto não faz sentido nenhum aqui. Não conheço nenhum paulista que diga tumate. Pode ser que haja, eu não conheço, mas dizer que a pronúncia de todos é essa é um tremendo exagero. Sempre associei essa pronúncia ao Rio de Janeiro e a Minas Gerais. Isso é corroborado pelo que encontrei na Internet, que o autor é mineiro. O que ele disse a respeito dos professores de português bem se aplica a ele próprio. Ele deveria ter-se informado melhor. É sempre muito problemático fazer afirmações tão genéricas e categóricas num país continental como o Brasil.
Vamos começar com um caso bem simples, que tem a ver com a relação entre a ortografia e a pronúncia: a primeira vogal da palavra tomate, na pronúncia, é u. Isso não é característica da "pronúncia inculta", mas da fala de todas as pessoas, de qualquer classe social ou nível de escolarização. Se você não acredita, vá ao mercado ou ao sacolão e fique de tocaia junto a uma banca de legumes: quantas pessoas perguntam o preço do "tumate" e quanto as do "tomate"? Você rapidamente se convencerá de que a pronúncia normal é com u. No entanto, muita gente nega isso. Alguns professores de português (que deveriam estar bem informados a respeito) insistem comigo que a pronúncia é com "o". (Grifo meu.)
Sei o que ele quis dizer, e tem razão, mas o exemplo que colheu foi muito infeliz. Isto não faz sentido nenhum aqui. Não conheço nenhum paulista que diga tumate. Pode ser que haja, eu não conheço, mas dizer que a pronúncia de todos é essa é um tremendo exagero. Sempre associei essa pronúncia ao Rio de Janeiro e a Minas Gerais. Isso é corroborado pelo que encontrei na Internet, que o autor é mineiro. O que ele disse a respeito dos professores de português bem se aplica a ele próprio. Ele deveria ter-se informado melhor. É sempre muito problemático fazer afirmações tão genéricas e categóricas num país continental como o Brasil.
Monday, July 11, 2011
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Japanese Holidays Function for MySQL
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIVNC0b5taePfHe5hJRN_1kRtyvJfWdsgq6ZhOT-Ris/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)